chore: upgrade backend dependencies

[atarashansky]

Reviewers

Functional:

Readability:

---

Changes

• black changes
• flake8 changes
• miscellaneous fixes related to dependency upgrades
• pandas still pinned to under 2.0 as 2.0 introduces a lot of breaking changes to many unit tests

Note:

• I encourage reviewers to make pydist and pip install the distribution to test cellxgene locally. In my hands, i observed no regressions.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (4bb9a2b) 0.00% compared to head (aa414bf) 70.52%.

❗ Current head aa414bf differs from pull request most recent head fc2511a. Consider uploading reports for the commit fc2511a to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
server/common/annotations/local_file_csv.py	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
server/cli/annotate.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
server/common/genesets.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
server/common/rest.py	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main    #2641       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   70.52%   +70.52%     
=========================================
  Files         0       96       +96     
  Lines         0     6652     +6652     
  Branches      0      769      +769     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     4691     +4691     
- Misses        0     1885     +1885     
- Partials      0       76       +76     

Flag	Coverage Δ
frontend	70.52% <79.16%> (?)
javascript	70.52% <79.16%> (?)
unitTest	70.52% <79.16%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[atolopko-czi]

LGTM, but didn't try make pydist as requested, so ignore my approval if that's a strongly recommended reviewer task.