Skip to content

This repository houses scripts to accompany Crawford et al. 2021 (Ecological Applications), in which we apply a range of biodiversity indices to an agricultural land-use prioritization model, using Zambia as a case study to investigate how variation in how biodiversity is represented affects the results of land-use prioritization analyses.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

chriscra/biodiversity_index_variation

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

64 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Consequences of under-explored variation in biodiversity indices used for land-use prioritization

DOI

This repository houses scripts with data and analyses for:

Crawford C.L.*, Estes L.D., Searchinger T.D., and Wilcove, D.S. 2021. Consequences of under-explored variation in biodiversity indices used for land-use prioritization. Ecological Applications 31(7): e02396. 10.1002/eap.2396

*@chriscra, ccrawford@princeton.edu, Robertson Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

We explore how variation in the design of biodiversity indices affects the outcome of land-use prioritization. We use the agroEcoTradeoff land-use prioritization model (Estes and Spiegel 2016, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4754548), a trade-off model designed to identify areas for agricultural expansion that meet a given production target at the least environmental cost, and apply the model to a case study in Zambia. The agroEcoTradeoff model allows users to minimize four constraints -- 1) biodiversity loss, 2) total agricultural area (maximizing yields), 3) carbon loss, and 4) transportation costs. Our analysis focuses on how biodiversity loss is modeled: specifically, we assess agreement between the least biodiverse areas in Zambia as identified by biodiversity indices that vary in their construction. We explore results for a wide range of criteria and methods that biologists and land-use planners have used, including: published composite indices, vertebrate taxonomic groups, metrics of species richness, methods for combining layers, and spatial resolutions.

This is a living repository. See the public release and Zenodo archive for the code used at time of publication.

Components of this Repository

This repository has one primary directory housing the scripts used in our analysis. Because the data sources are all either publicly available or available upon request from the appropriate organizations, this repository does not include the raw data itself.

The five primary .Rmd scripts are numbered based on the order in which parts of the analysis were conducted. Note that these .Rmd scripts are intended to be run interactively chunk by chunk (sometimes line by line), not knit together all at once. They also include code for data visualization and exploratory data analysis; not all code is strictly required. These files include:

  • 1_Start.Rmd serves as a useful working starting place, loading required packages, custom functions, and useful GIS components. This script was originally meant for development, and is not strictly necessary for reproducing the analysis.
  • 2_BD_input_prep.Rmd outlines the production of various biodiversity inputs explored in this project directly from data sources.
  • 3_Model_Runs.Rmd takes these biodiversity inputs and runs them through the agroEcoTradeoff model, applying seven primary model weighting specifications (distributing weight between biodiversity and other constraints like yield, carbon loss, and travel cost). This also includes model runs for a range of robustness checks.
  • 4_Analyses.Rmd analyzes the model outputs, most notably extracting and merging model conversion recommendations, calculating weighted Jaccard Similarity values, and producing a range of summary statistics. This script also contains code to produce a wide range of figures, including those in our main text and a larger number for the Appendix S1.
  • 5_SI.Rmd is a stand-alone document to produce our supplementary material, "Appendix S1."

Scripts starting with "cc_" serve as utility scripts, housing the packages (cc_libraries.R), custom functions (cc_functions.R), and file path names (cc_pathnames.R) used in the analysis.

Downloading agroEcoTradeoff

Note that in order for these scripts to run, one must download the agroEcoTradeoff package, which must be downloaded directly. See: https://github.com/agroimpacts/agroEcoTradeoff. To do accomplish this in a Unix shell environment (e.g. bash), make sure gdal and wget are installed. One can use brew to install gdal, and then install wget. (See here for an example of how to install wget for Mac OS.)

After that, run the following three lines of code from the agroEcoTradeoff GitHub in your shell environment, which will then install the agroEcoTradeoff package:

wget https://github.com/agroimpacts/agroEcoTradeoff/raw/master/installer.sh
chmod +x installer.sh
./installer.sh

The first line uses wget to download the installer.sh script from the agroEcoTradeoff github. The second line changes the scripts permissions to allow it to be executed. "chmod" is a command for modifying the file's permissions. "+x" sets execute permissions. The script name is placed last, so that the shell environment knows which file to modify. The third line runs the script itself.

In order for the agroEcoTradeoff model to work correctly, the working directory of your R project must be set to your "agroEcoTradeoff/" directory. If you're working in a git repository, your repository can have a different name from the folder within which your R project lives, but the folder on your machine must be named "agroEcoTradeoff/". You can create a scripts folder within your "agroEcoTradeoff/" directory, and go from there. The data that the agroEcoTradeoff model pulls from is housed in a folder within external/data/folder_name. Users provide the "folder_name" as the "input key" that points the model towards the folder you want when you run tradeoff_mod(input_key = "folder_name") function.

About

This repository houses scripts to accompany Crawford et al. 2021 (Ecological Applications), in which we apply a range of biodiversity indices to an agricultural land-use prioritization model, using Zambia as a case study to investigate how variation in how biodiversity is represented affects the results of land-use prioritization analyses.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published