drop ? values #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removing
?values that cause an exception on the webapp.@xrotwang @haspelmath Do you remember if the
?have any special meaning? Like, are they just missing data or explicit markers for known unknowns? If it's the latter I could also add a code for the?values (like unknown) instead of doing this.As things are right now this data set contains parameters where some of the values have assigned codes and some don't, which trips up clld when it tries to plot them onto a map:
https://github.com/clld/clld/blob/55cee1e04f37ceb2bd0e325364edc4f1f9295185/src/clld/web/adapters/geojson.py#L185-L186