Skip to content

Rename repo as we no longer use gke for the concourse #694

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jpalermo
Copy link

No description provided.

@beyhan beyhan requested a review from rkoster September 25, 2023 14:32
Copy link
Contributor

@rkoster rkoster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Woudn't fiwg or fi be more appropriate? Or is this repo still reusable enough to justify using the cff suffix?

@beyhan beyhan added the wg label Sep 25, 2023
@jpalermo
Copy link
Author

Good question. That's something @ramonskie and I were talking about.

It's not currently in that state, and would require some work to make it more generic. Is there a desire for that, or should we make it fi specific?

@beyhan
Copy link
Member

beyhan commented Oct 10, 2023

Other WG decided to go with a slightly different approach available in https://github.com/cloudfoundry/app-runtime-interfaces-infrastructure/. I would say that currently there is no desire and we shouldn't do the extra effort. I would vote for fiwg in this case.

@beyhan beyhan self-requested a review October 10, 2023 12:36
@jpalermo jpalermo force-pushed the pr_rename_concourse-infra-for-gke_to_concourse-infra-for-cff branch from 44e7627 to d59221e Compare October 11, 2023 03:37
@jpalermo
Copy link
Author

PR updated with new name

@beyhan
Copy link
Member

beyhan commented Nov 7, 2023

ping @rkoster

@jpalermo jpalermo merged commit eb17054 into main Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants