Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move volume services to App-runtime-platform #940

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pivotal-marcela-campo
Copy link
Member

Approvers for volume services are now all members of app-runtime-platform. Whilst the separation between platform (volman) and services (volume services in this case) makes sense theoretically, in practice means that the same engineers need to be part of two working groups and liase with different leaders in the CF org, for a project that is not particularly active in the community at this point.

@beyhan beyhan requested review from a team, beyhan, stephanme and ChrisMcGowan and removed request for a team August 6, 2024 12:04
@beyhan beyhan added the toc label Aug 6, 2024
@ameowlia
Copy link
Member

ameowlia commented Aug 6, 2024

⚠️ This PR removes the following approvers from the area: @dlresende, @totherme, @blgm, @ifindlay-cci, @nouseforaname, @syslxg, @jhvhs.

If you would like to remain an approver, please comment here and I will add you back.

If you are okay with having your approver status revoked, please emoji react on this comment with a 👍 .

You have two weeks to refute this removal. If you do not comment by Aug 20th your approver status will be revoked.

@ameowlia ameowlia merged commit 0b182c2 into main Aug 27, 2024
2 checks passed
@ameowlia ameowlia deleted the move-volume-services branch August 27, 2024 14:36
pivotal-marcela-campo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
with #940 we effectively handed over volume services to app-runtime-platform WG. This just reflects that fact in the Service Management WG charter.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants