[NGT] Implement NanoAOD ntuples production for HLT Muon objects
#47069
Conversation
Include HLT L2 Muon offline seeds in the event content to compare them with the ones from L1Tk Muons
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-47069/43241 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Parsifal-2045 for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @DickyChant, @fabiocos, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
type ngt |
|
enable nano |
|
please test |
| @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ def SwapKeepAndDrop(l): | |||
| phase2_muon.toModify(FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent, | |||
| outputCommands = FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent.outputCommands + [ | |||
| 'keep recoMuons_muons1stStep_*_*', | |||
| 'keep *_hltL2OfflineMuonSeeds_*_*', | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
does this need to be saved regardless or can it be (for the time being) gated through the phase2L2AndL3Muons modifier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's actually the other way around. The collection is not produced when using the phase2L2AndL3Muons procModifier, but I decided to produce ntuples also for the both the current muon seeds collections, namely the "offline" one and the one from L1Tk Muons (at least for now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The collection is not produced when using the phase2L2AndL3Muons procModifier,
I then suggest to apply the reverse modifier, that way it will be easier to remove once it's re-absorbed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The collection is not produced when using the phase2L2AndL3Muons procModifier,
I then suggest to apply the reverse modifier, that way it will be easier to remove once it's re-absorbed.
What's the correct syntax for that? I now have (phase2Muon and not phase2L3AndL3Muons).toModify...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What's the syntax for that?
(phase2Muon & ~phase2L2AndL3Muons).toModify(...)(OTOH, I am not formally a reviewer of this PR, so I let the @cms-sw/operations-l2 decide what's best -- incidentally ever increasing the size of FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent will inevitably lead to operation issues when trying to run big MC samples production )
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
cmsbuild
added
operations-approved
tests-approved
and removed
operations-pending
tests-started
labels
|
+Upgrade |
PR description:
This PR allows to produce, on-demand, ntuples in
NanoAODformat for all HLT muon objects, including L1TkMuons and all the new collections introduced by #46897.The production is triggered automatically when running .777 or .778 workflows. Otherwise, it can be triggered by adding
NANO:@MUHLTas a step in any step2cmsDrivercommand, together with the addition ofNANOAODSIMin bothdatatierandeventcontent.PR validation:
No physics changes are foreseen.
I've tested on the usual 29834 and 29850 workflows also in their .777 and .778 flavours, in all cases the workflows run and ntuples are produced correctly
.0 workflows require to manually trigger the nutples production using, for example: