Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Speed up function format_complex_number by 119% in src/black/numerics.py #56

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codeflash-ai[bot]
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

📄 format_complex_number in src/black/numerics.py

✨ Performance Summary:

  • Speed Increase: 📈 119% (1.19x faster)
  • Runtime Reduction: ⏱️ From 1.19 millisecond down to 545 microseconds (best of 138 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

These changes should make the program slightly faster and more efficient in terms of memory usage.


Correctness verification

The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below:

Test Status Details
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 38 Passed See below
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 1 Passed
📊 Coverage 100.0%

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

Click to view details
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from black.numerics import format_complex_number

# unit tests

# Basic Test Cases
def test_standard_complex_number():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("123.456j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("0.789j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("123j")

def test_complex_number_without_leading_digits():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(".456j")

def test_complex_number_without_trailing_digits():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("123.j")

# Edge Test Cases
def test_empty_string():
    with pytest.raises(IndexError):
        format_complex_number("")


def test_leading_zeros():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("00123.456j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("000.789j")

def test_negative_complex_numbers():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-123.456j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-0.789j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-123.j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-0.j")





def test_whitespace_in_input():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("  123.456j  ")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(" 0.789j ")




def test_very_large_integer():
    large_number = "1" * 1000000 + "j"
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(large_number)

def test_very_large_floating_point_number():
    large_number = "1" * 500000 + "." + "1" * 500000 + "j"
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(large_number)

def test_very_large_negative_floating_point_number():
    large_number = "-" + "1" * 500000 + "." + "1" * 500000 + "j"
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(large_number)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from black.numerics import format_complex_number

# unit tests

# Basic Valid Inputs
def test_basic_integer_imaginary():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("10j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("0j")

def test_basic_float_imaginary():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("10.5j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("0.5j")

def test_float_no_integer_part():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(".5j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(".0j")

# Edge Cases
def test_missing_fractional_part():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("10.j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("0.j")


def test_negative_numbers():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-10j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-10.5j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-0.5j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-0.j")

# Invalid Inputs

def test_empty_string():
    with pytest.raises(IndexError):
        format_complex_number("")

# Large Scale Test Cases
def test_very_large_numbers():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("12345678901234567890j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("12345678901234567890.1234567890j")

def test_very_small_numbers():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("0.0000000000000001j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-0.0000000000000001j")

# Boundary Cases
def test_single_digit():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("1j")
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number("-1j")


def test_whitespace_handling():
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(" 10j ".strip())
    codeflash_output = format_complex_number(" 10.5j ".strip())

📣 **Feedback**

If you have any feedback or need assistance, feel free to join our Discord community:

Discord

These changes should make the program slightly faster and more efficient in terms of memory usage.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Dec 14, 2024
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from misrasaurabh1 December 14, 2024 04:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants