forked from langchain-ai/langchain
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚡️ Speed up VectorDBQA.validate_search_type()
by 6% in libs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py
#48
Open
codeflash-ai
wants to merge
12
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
codeflash/optimize-VectorDBQA.validate_search_type-2024-03-13T23.53.55
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint-2024-02-16T21.21.16 ⚡️ Speed up `_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint()` by 122,591% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
… `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…-function-_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint-2024-02-16T21.21.16 Revert "⚡️ Speed up `_import_baidu_qianfan_endpoint()` by 122,591% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…_import_aviary-2024-02-16T21.17.19 ⚡️ Speed up `_import_aviary()` by 526,374% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
…/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…-function-_import_aviary-2024-02-16T21.17.19 Revert "⚡️ Speed up `_import_aviary()` by 526,374% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`"
…_import_arcee-2024-02-16T21.14.24 ⚡️ Speed up `_import_arcee()` by 2,804,341% in `libs/langchain/langchain/llms/__init__.py`
Your Python program already follows good coding practices, and it is efficient enough. Since it doesn't involve handling big data or any computational intensive tasks, further optimization might not have a significant impact. But, as a general Python programming optimization, using local variables instead of global ones makes accessing faster. So, in this context, storing the result of `'search_type' in values` in a variable and reusing it might be slightly more efficient. Here is the slightly improved version. But remember, Python's built-in operators and functions are highly optimized and are generally more efficient than custom-typed code. And also, the best way to make your code faster is to profile the code and find where most of the time/memory is spent.
59688e1
to
3f7da03
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄
VectorDBQA.validate_search_type()
inlibs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py
📈 Performance improved by
6%
(0.06x
faster)⏱️ Runtime went down from
1.54μs
to1.46μs
Explanation and details
(click to show)
Your Python program already follows good coding practices, and it is efficient enough. Since it doesn't involve handling big data or any computational intensive tasks, further optimization might not have a significant impact. But, as a general Python programming optimization, using local variables instead of global ones makes accessing faster. So, in this context, storing the result of
'search_type' in values
in a variable and reusing it might be slightly more efficient. Here is the slightly improved version.But remember, Python's built-in operators and functions are highly optimized and are generally more efficient than custom-typed code. And also, the best way to make your code faster is to profile the code and find where most of the time/memory is spent.
Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.
🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests
✅ 13 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests
(click to show generated tests)