⚡️ Speed up VectorDBQA.validate_search_type()
by 7% in libs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py
#49
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄
VectorDBQA.validate_search_type()
inlibs/langchain/langchain/chains/retrieval_qa/base.py
📈 Performance improved by
7%
(0.07x
faster)⏱️ Runtime went down from
1.92μs
to1.79μs
Explanation and details
(click to show)
The given code snippet is already very optimized and simple. However, we can speed it up a little bit by eliminating the local variable assignment.
Here, we are directly accessing the "search_type" value from the dictionary and combining both conditions into one line. This way, we eliminate the unnecessary variable assignment thus marginally speeding up the code execution. But the improvement might be negligible given that the original code was already optimized.
Correctness verification
The new optimized code was tested for correctness. The results are listed below.
🔘 (none found) − ⚙️ Existing Unit Tests
✅ 19 Passed − 🌀 Generated Regression Tests
(click to show generated tests)