Update bubble_sort.py #144

davidgirdwood1 · 2025-02-14T23:16:19Z

No description provided.

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:18:34Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #146

If you approve, it will be merged into this PR (branch davidgirdwood1-patch-2).

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:20:26Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #147

If you approve, it will be merged into this PR (branch davidgirdwood1-patch-2).

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:22:53Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #148

If you approve, it will be merged into this PR (branch davidgirdwood1-patch-2).

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:38:44Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:38:47Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Test Dave:

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	✅ 3 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage	undefined

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests

# function to test

def sorter(arr):
    for i in range(len(arr)):
        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
                temp = arr[j]
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
                arr[j + 1] = temp
    return arr

# unit tests

# Test with an empty list
def test_sorter_empty():
    assert sorter([]) == []

# Test with a single-element list
def test_sorter_single_element():
    assert sorter([42]) == [42]

# Test with a two-element list
def test_sorter_two_elements():
    assert sorter([2, 1]) == [1, 2]
    assert sorter([1, 2]) == [1, 2]

# Test with sorted lists
def test_sorter_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]) == [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

# Test with reverse-sorted lists
def test_sorter_reverse_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]) == [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

# Test with lists with duplicates
def test_sorter_with_duplicates():
    assert sorter([3, 1, 2, 1, 3]) == [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
    assert sorter([5, 5, 5, 5]) == [5, 5, 5, 5]

# Test with lists with negative numbers
def test_sorter_with_negative_numbers():
    assert sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2]) == [-3, -2, -1, 0, 2]
    assert sorter([-10, 100, -50, 0]) == [-50, -10, 0, 100]

# Test with lists with varying types of numbers
def test_sorter_with_various_number_types():
    assert sorter([1.5, 2.3, 1.1, 2.0, 1.9]) == [1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 2.0, 2.3]
    assert sorter([1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]) == [1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]

# Test with large lists
def test_sorter_large_list():
    large_list = list(range(1000, 0, -1))  # 1000 to 1 in reverse order
    assert sorter(large_list) == sorted(large_list)

# Test with lists with non-numeric values
def test_sorter_non_numeric():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['a', 'aa', 'aaa'])

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:41:19Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:41:22Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Test Dave:

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	✅ 3 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage	undefined

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests

# function to test

def sorter(arr):
    for i in range(len(arr)):
        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
                temp = arr[j]
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
                arr[j + 1] = temp
    return arr

# unit tests

# Test with an empty list
def test_sorter_empty():
    assert sorter([]) == []

# Test with a single-element list
def test_sorter_single_element():
    assert sorter([42]) == [42]

# Test with a two-element list
def test_sorter_two_elements():
    assert sorter([2, 1]) == [1, 2]
    assert sorter([1, 2]) == [1, 2]

# Test with sorted lists
def test_sorter_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]) == [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

# Test with reverse-sorted lists
def test_sorter_reverse_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]) == [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

# Test with lists with duplicates
def test_sorter_with_duplicates():
    assert sorter([3, 1, 2, 1, 3]) == [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
    assert sorter([5, 5, 5, 5]) == [5, 5, 5, 5]

# Test with lists with negative numbers
def test_sorter_with_negative_numbers():
    assert sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2]) == [-3, -2, -1, 0, 2]
    assert sorter([-10, 100, -50, 0]) == [-50, -10, 0, 100]

# Test with lists with varying types of numbers
def test_sorter_with_various_number_types():
    assert sorter([1.5, 2.3, 1.1, 2.0, 1.9]) == [1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 2.0, 2.3]
    assert sorter([1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]) == [1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]

# Test with large lists
def test_sorter_large_list():
    large_list = list(range(1000, 0, -1))  # 1000 to 1 in reverse order
    assert sorter(large_list) == sorted(large_list)

# Test with lists with non-numeric values
def test_sorter_non_numeric():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['a', 'aa', 'aaa'])

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-14T23:43:13Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-15T00:02:45Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-15T00:03:02Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Test Dave:

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	✅ 3 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage	undefined

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests

# function to test

def sorter(arr):
    for i in range(len(arr)):
        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
                temp = arr[j]
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
                arr[j + 1] = temp
    return arr

# unit tests

# Test with an empty list
def test_sorter_empty():
    assert sorter([]) == []

# Test with a single-element list
def test_sorter_single_element():
    assert sorter([42]) == [42]

# Test with a two-element list
def test_sorter_two_elements():
    assert sorter([2, 1]) == [1, 2]
    assert sorter([1, 2]) == [1, 2]

# Test with sorted lists
def test_sorter_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]) == [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

# Test with reverse-sorted lists
def test_sorter_reverse_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]) == [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

# Test with lists with duplicates
def test_sorter_with_duplicates():
    assert sorter([3, 1, 2, 1, 3]) == [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
    assert sorter([5, 5, 5, 5]) == [5, 5, 5, 5]

# Test with lists with negative numbers
def test_sorter_with_negative_numbers():
    assert sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2]) == [-3, -2, -1, 0, 2]
    assert sorter([-10, 100, -50, 0]) == [-50, -10, 0, 100]

# Test with lists with varying types of numbers
def test_sorter_with_various_number_types():
    assert sorter([1.5, 2.3, 1.1, 2.0, 1.9]) == [1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 2.0, 2.3]
    assert sorter([1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]) == [1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]

# Test with large lists
def test_sorter_large_list():
    large_list = list(range(1000, 0, -1))  # 1000 to 1 in reverse order
    assert sorter(large_list) == sorted(large_list)

# Test with lists with non-numeric values
def test_sorter_non_numeric():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['a', 'aa', 'aaa'])

To test these changes git merge codeflash/codeflash/optimize-pr144-2025-02-15T00.02.17

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-15T00:30:41Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai · 2025-02-15T00:30:44Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Test Dave:

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	✅ 3 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage	undefined

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests

# function to test

def sorter(arr):
    for i in range(len(arr)):
        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
                temp = arr[j]
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
                arr[j + 1] = temp
    return arr

# unit tests

# Test with an empty list
def test_sorter_empty():
    assert sorter([]) == []

# Test with a single-element list
def test_sorter_single_element():
    assert sorter([42]) == [42]

# Test with a two-element list
def test_sorter_two_elements():
    assert sorter([2, 1]) == [1, 2]
    assert sorter([1, 2]) == [1, 2]

# Test with sorted lists
def test_sorter_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]) == [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

# Test with reverse-sorted lists
def test_sorter_reverse_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]) == [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

# Test with lists with duplicates
def test_sorter_with_duplicates():
    assert sorter([3, 1, 2, 1, 3]) == [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
    assert sorter([5, 5, 5, 5]) == [5, 5, 5, 5]

# Test with lists with negative numbers
def test_sorter_with_negative_numbers():
    assert sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2]) == [-3, -2, -1, 0, 2]
    assert sorter([-10, 100, -50, 0]) == [-50, -10, 0, 100]

# Test with lists with varying types of numbers
def test_sorter_with_various_number_types():
    assert sorter([1.5, 2.3, 1.1, 2.0, 1.9]) == [1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 2.0, 2.3]
    assert sorter([1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]) == [1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]

# Test with large lists
def test_sorter_large_list():
    large_list = list(range(1000, 0, -1))  # 1000 to 1 in reverse order
    assert sorter(large_list) == sorted(large_list)

# Test with lists with non-numeric values
def test_sorter_non_numeric():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['a', 'aa', 'aaa'])

To test this change git merge codeflash/optimize-pr144-2025-02-15T00.30.35

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai-dev · 2025-02-19T21:55:42Z

bubble_sort.py

+
+
+def sorter2(arr):
+    for i in range(len(arr)):


Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai-dev · 2025-02-19T21:55:45Z

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

⏱️ Runtime : 1070554.63 → 25.42 (best of undefined runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Test Dave:

✅ Correctness verification report:

Test	Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests	🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests	✅ 3 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage	undefined

🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests

# function to test

def sorter(arr):
    for i in range(len(arr)):
        for j in range(len(arr) - 1):
            if arr[j] > arr[j + 1]:
                temp = arr[j]
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1]
                arr[j + 1] = temp
    return arr

# unit tests

# Test with an empty list
def test_sorter_empty():
    assert sorter([]) == []

# Test with a single-element list
def test_sorter_single_element():
    assert sorter([42]) == [42]

# Test with a two-element list
def test_sorter_two_elements():
    assert sorter([2, 1]) == [1, 2]
    assert sorter([1, 2]) == [1, 2]

# Test with sorted lists
def test_sorter_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]) == [0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10]

# Test with reverse-sorted lists
def test_sorter_reverse_sorted_list():
    assert sorter([5, 4, 3, 2, 1]) == [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    assert sorter([-1, -2, -3, -4, -5]) == [-5, -4, -3, -2, -1]

# Test with lists with duplicates
def test_sorter_with_duplicates():
    assert sorter([3, 1, 2, 1, 3]) == [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]
    assert sorter([5, 5, 5, 5]) == [5, 5, 5, 5]

# Test with lists with negative numbers
def test_sorter_with_negative_numbers():
    assert sorter([-1, -3, -2, 0, 2]) == [-3, -2, -1, 0, 2]
    assert sorter([-10, 100, -50, 0]) == [-50, -10, 0, 100]

# Test with lists with varying types of numbers
def test_sorter_with_various_number_types():
    assert sorter([1.5, 2.3, 1.1, 2.0, 1.9]) == [1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 2.0, 2.3]
    assert sorter([1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]) == [1, 2.0, 3, 4.5]

# Test with large lists
def test_sorter_large_list():
    large_list = list(range(1000, 0, -1))  # 1000 to 1 in reverse order
    assert sorter(large_list) == sorted(large_list)

# Test with lists with non-numeric values
def test_sorter_non_numeric():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['apple', 'banana', 'cherry'])

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):  # We expect a TypeError because sorter is not designed for non-numeric values
        sorter(['a', 'aa', 'aaa'])

To test this optimization git merge codeflash/optimize-pr144-2025-02-19T21.55.35

Update bubble_sort.py

2f1a879

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

b5819b1

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #146

Closed

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

ff80cae

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #147

Closed

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

6b397fb

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #148

Closed

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

4a9f898

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot reviewed Feb 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

bubble_sort.py

def sorter2(arr):

for i in range(len(arr)):

Copy link

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

20ffcd3

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot reviewed Feb 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

bubble_sort.py

def sorter2(arr):

for i in range(len(arr)):

Copy link

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

6243674

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot reviewed Feb 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

bubble_sort.py

def sorter2(arr):

for i in range(len(arr)):

Copy link

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

8902205

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot reviewed Feb 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

bubble_sort.py

def sorter2(arr):

for i in range(len(arr)):

Copy link

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

codeflash-ai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

a8d7b6e

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai bot reviewed Feb 15, 2025

View reviewed changes

bubble_sort.py

def sorter2(arr):

for i in range(len(arr)):

Copy link

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

for i in range(len(arr)):

for i in range(len(arr)-1):

davidgirdwood1 closed this Feb 19, 2025

codeflash-ai-dev bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwoo…

cdffd62

…d1-patch-2`) Test Dave:

codeflash-ai-dev bot reviewed Feb 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update bubble_sort.py #144

Update bubble_sort.py #144

davidgirdwood1 commented Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #146

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #147

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #148

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 15, 2025

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 15, 2025

codeflash-ai-dev bot Feb 19, 2025

codeflash-ai-dev bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Update bubble_sort.py #144

Update bubble_sort.py #144

Conversation

davidgirdwood1 commented Feb 14, 2025

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #146

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #147

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py

I created a new dependent PR with the suggested changes. Please review:

⚡️ Speed up function sorter by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (davidgirdwood1-patch-2) #148

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in bubble_sort.py

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in bubble_sort.py

codeflash-ai bot Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 15, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in bubble_sort.py

codeflash-ai bot Feb 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai bot commented Feb 15, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in bubble_sort.py

codeflash-ai-dev bot Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codeflash-ai-dev bot commented Feb 19, 2025

⚡️ Codeflash found optimizations for this PR

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for sorter in bubble_sort.py

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #146

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #147

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `code_to_optimize/bubble_sort.py`

⚡️ Speed up function `sorter` by 4211531.56 in PR #144 (`davidgirdwood1-patch-2`) #148

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`

📄 4211531.56 (42115.32) speedup for `sorter` in `bubble_sort.py`