-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Template/e2e/testing #1167
Template/e2e/testing #1167
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
import test from "@playwright/test"; | ||
|
||
test.describe("Unauthenticated my-posts Page", () => { | ||
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => { | ||
await page.context().clearCookies(); | ||
}); | ||
// | ||
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users | ||
}); | ||
|
||
test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => { | ||
// | ||
// Replace with tests for authenticated users | ||
}); | ||
Comment on lines
+11
to
+14
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🛠️ Refactor suggestion Consider adding a The test suite for authenticated users is structured correctly, but it could benefit from a Consider adding a test.describe("Authenticated my-posts Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
// TODO: Set up authenticated state
// This might involve setting specific cookies or using a custom command to log in
});
// Replace with tests for authenticated users
}); Remember to replace the placeholder comment with actual test implementations for authenticated users.
Comment on lines
+1
to
+14
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Inconsistent test suite structures across e2e files. The 🔗 Analysis chainLGTM: Well-structured template for 'my-posts' e2e tests. This file provides an excellent foundation for end-to-end testing of the 'my-posts' page. It aligns well with the PR objectives by:
The structure allows for easy addition of specific tests in the future, which is in line with the author's intention to create related issues for these e2e tests. To ensure consistency across e2e test files, let's verify if a similar structure is used in other e2e test files: 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar structure in other e2e test files
# Test: Search for test suites in other e2e files
rg -A 5 'test.describe\("(Un)?authenticated' e2e/
Length of output: 1761 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
import test from "@playwright/test"; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
await page.context().clearCookies(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// Replace with tests for unauthenticated users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+3
to
+9
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fix typo and implement tests for unauthenticated users.
Here's a suggested fix for the typo: -test.describe("Unauthenticated setttings Page", () => {
+test.describe("Unauthenticated settings Page", () => { Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for unauthenticated users? 📝 Committable suggestion
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// Replace with tests for authenticated users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
}); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+11
to
+14
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Implement tests and consider adding a
Here's a suggested structure for the authenticated users test suite: test.describe("Authenticated settings Page", () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
// TODO: Set up authenticated state
// For example:
// await page.goto('/login');
// await page.fill('#email', 'user@example.com');
// await page.fill('#password', 'password123');
// await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
});
test('should display user settings when authenticated', async ({ page }) => {
// TODO: Implement test
});
// Add more tests as needed
}); Would you like assistance in generating some example tests for authenticated users? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! Ill implement this with some other tests also