Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: ports interceptor correction #1123

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

M4tteoP
Copy link
Member

@M4tteoP M4tteoP commented Aug 3, 2024

Ports from caddy to the reference implementation some @jcchavezs's findings. See: corazawaf/coraza-caddy#107

@M4tteoP M4tteoP requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2024 21:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.91%. Comparing base (4ff1f76) to head (76dd646).
Report is 85 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1123      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.72%   83.91%   +1.19%     
==========================================
  Files         162      166       +4     
  Lines        9080     7891    -1189     
==========================================
- Hits         7511     6622     -889     
+ Misses       1319     1019     -300     
  Partials      250      250              
Flag Coverage Δ
default 83.91% <100.00%> (+6.08%) ⬆️
examples 83.91% <100.00%> (+57.48%) ⬆️
ftw 83.91% <100.00%> (+36.55%) ⬆️
ftw-multiphase 83.91% <100.00%> (+34.37%) ⬆️
tinygo 83.91% <100.00%> (+8.51%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@M4tteoP M4tteoP enabled auto-merge (squash) September 27, 2024 15:14
@M4tteoP M4tteoP merged commit b7e5857 into corazawaf:main Sep 27, 2024
8 checks passed
@jcchavezs jcchavezs deleted the interceptor_fix branch September 27, 2024 18:12
@fzipi
Copy link
Member

fzipi commented Nov 4, 2024

@9mlcy7 Sorry, can you translate your thoughts into English?

@jcchavezs
Copy link
Member

@9mlcy7 how is this a problem? if no interception we aim to return the write return values as they are isn't?

@9mlcy7
Copy link

9mlcy7 commented Nov 6, 2024

@jcchavezs You're right; the issue occurred because I made some custom modifications to the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants