Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: nits and avoids mentioning not existing resources #1203

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

M4tteoP
Copy link
Member

@M4tteoP M4tteoP commented Nov 7, 2024

No description provided.

@M4tteoP M4tteoP changed the title nits:doc nits: documentation Nov 7, 2024
@M4tteoP M4tteoP changed the title nits: documentation docs: nits and avoids mentioning not existing resources Nov 7, 2024
@@ -774,9 +774,6 @@ func directiveSecAuditLogRelevantStatus(options *DirectiveOptions) error {
// Syntax: SecAuditLogParts [PARTLETTERS]
// Default: ABCFHZ
// ---
// The format of the audit log format is documented in detail in the Audit Log Data
// Format Documentation.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is Audit Log Data Format Documentation somewhere? If so, we should point it here. I can't find it and the same line looks to be copy pasted from ModSec doc

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.46%. Comparing base (4ff1f76) to head (d7f4ace).
Report is 116 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1203      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.72%   83.46%   +0.74%     
==========================================
  Files         162      166       +4     
  Lines        9080     9611     +531     
==========================================
+ Hits         7511     8022     +511     
- Misses       1319     1338      +19     
- Partials      250      251       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
default 83.46% <ø> (+5.62%) ⬆️
examples 83.46% <ø> (+57.03%) ⬆️
ftw 83.46% <ø> (+36.09%) ⬆️
ftw-multiphase 83.46% <ø> (+33.92%) ⬆️
tinygo 83.46% <ø> (+8.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@M4tteoP M4tteoP marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 09:33
@M4tteoP M4tteoP requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2024 09:33
@jcchavezs jcchavezs merged commit 5fbd62a into corazawaf:main Nov 7, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants