fix: Resolve infinite recursion in Auth API #10
Conversation
Change-Id: I3042c85ea174c93e72d1617b473ea987c5e8ac8c
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hanzeINGH has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to authentication and context management across three files: Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AuthTransport
participant AuthClient
participant Core
Client->>AuthTransport: Make HTTP Request
AuthTransport->>AuthTransport: Check Context Authentication
alt Is Authenticated Context
AuthTransport->>Core: Forward Request Directly
else Not Authenticated
AuthTransport->>AuthClient: Retrieve Access Token
AuthClient-->>AuthTransport: Return Token
AuthTransport->>Core: Add Authorization Header
AuthTransport->>Core: Forward Request
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
hanzeINGH
changed the title
hanzeINGH
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
utils.go (1)
58-60: Consider adding validation for nil contextThe function should handle nil context gracefully.
func genAuthContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { + if ctx == nil { + ctx = context.Background() + } return context.WithValue(ctx, authContextKey, authContextValue) }🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
59-59: SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions
(staticcheck)
🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.21)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.19)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.18)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
auth.go(3 hunks)client.go(1 hunks)utils.go(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
utils.go
59-59: SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions
(staticcheck)
🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.21)
utils.go
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.19)
utils.go
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
🪛 GitHub Check: Test (1.18)
utils.go
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
[failure] 59-59:
SA1029: should not use built-in type string as key for value; define your own type to avoid collisions (staticcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test (1.23)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
utils.go (1)
62-72: LGTM! The context validation is thoroughThe implementation properly validates both the existence and type of the context value.
client.go (1)
98-100: LGTM! Effectively prevents JWT request transport cycleThe implementation successfully breaks the potential infinite recursion by checking the auth context before attempting token retrieval.
auth.go (1)
288-288: LGTM! Consistent application of auth contextThe auth context is consistently applied across all token retrieval methods, ensuring the solution works uniformly throughout the authentication flow.
Also applies to: 465-465, 519-519
Change-Id: Ia9ff6a11bdf31f14645b6d6db12dd05b305ce5ac
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
utils.go (3)
53-53: Use English comments for consistencyReplace the Chinese comment with its English equivalent: "Define custom type for context keys"
54-64: Add godoc comments for exported types and functionsAdd documentation comments to improve code maintainability and help users understand the purpose of each component.
Apply these changes:
+// contextKey is a custom type for context keys to prevent collisions type contextKey string const ( + // authContextKey is the key used to store authentication status in context authContextKey = contextKey("auth_context") + // authContextValue represents an authenticated context authContextValue = "1" ) +// genAuthContext creates a new context with authentication information func genAuthContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, authContextKey, authContextValue) }
56-60: Improve type safety for context valuesConsider using a custom type for
authContextValueto make it more type-safe and prevent accidental string comparisons.Here's a suggested improvement:
+type authStatus string const ( authContextKey = contextKey("auth_context") - authContextValue = "1" + authContextValue = authStatus("authenticated") )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
utils.go(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test (1.22)
|
fix #9 |
chyroc
changed the title
Fix the infinite recursion problem caused during JWT authentication.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Technical Updates