[feat][backend]: openclaw_trace

[cuichen01]

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

• This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
• The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
• Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
• This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.22807% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ckend/modules/observability/application/openapi.go	96.15%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ty/infra/mq/consumer/autotask_callback_consumer.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...servability/infra/mq/consumer/backfill_consumer.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...rvability/infra/mq/consumer/correction_consumer.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...infra/mq/consumer/span_with_annotation_consumer.go	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #457      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.68%   75.70%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         640      641       +1     
  Lines       68796    68806      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits        52065    52090      +25     
+ Misses      13455    13447       -8     
+ Partials     3276     3269       -7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.70% <91.22%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...bservability/domain/trace/service/trace_service.go	87.07% <100.00%> (+0.22%)	⬆️
...rvability/infra/mq/consumer/annotation_consumer.go	57.14% <100.00%> (+1.58%)	⬆️
...s/observability/infra/mq/consumer/task_consumer.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...a/span_context_extractor/span_context_extractor.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ckend/modules/observability/application/openapi.go	84.22% <96.15%> (+0.84%)	⬆️
...ty/infra/mq/consumer/autotask_callback_consumer.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...servability/infra/mq/consumer/backfill_consumer.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rvability/infra/mq/consumer/correction_consumer.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...infra/mq/consumer/span_with_annotation_consumer.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a0f249...b08ca47. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[taoyifan89]

这里是不是不要做那么多处理了，就把logid, traceid, filter扔到processor里去。在processor里再去处理

[cuichen01]

OK，已放到下层

[taoyifan89]

同上

[taoyifan89]

直接就用FilterFields？