Skip to content

Conversation

@marcdo7
Copy link
Contributor

@marcdo7 marcdo7 commented Oct 11, 2024

fixed #235

@marcdo7 marcdo7 requested a review from labkode as a code owner October 11, 2024 12:21
@labkode labkode requested a review from jessegeens October 14, 2024 14:31
@labkode
Copy link
Member

labkode commented Oct 14, 2024

@jessegeens can you review?

@glpatcern glpatcern changed the title Add options to build better java clients #235 Add options to build better java clients Oct 22, 2024
@glpatcern
Copy link
Member

Hi @marcdo7, thanks for this addition, any specific reason why you need it on the storage provider API and not on the gateway API? A priori the latter is the "public" API that relays to all other APIs.

@glpatcern
Copy link
Member

I understand this is necessary (despite no further comments), so I'm going ahead and merge this.

@glpatcern glpatcern self-requested a review May 8, 2025 08:11
@glpatcern glpatcern merged commit fdf599b into cs3org:main May 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Missing Options in cs3.storage.provider.v1beta1.ProviderAPI

3 participants