feat: PatchMeasure member expression

[mcheshkov]

Check List

• Tests have been run in packages where changes made if available
• Linter has been run for changed code
• Tests for the changes have been added if not covered yet
• Docs have been added / updated if required

Issue Reference this PR resolves

[For example #12]

Description of Changes Made (if issue reference is not provided)

[Description goes here]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.67438% with 90 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.63%. Comparing base (671bcdb) to head (6275676).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...t/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/engine/df/wrapper.rs	81.72%	55 Missing ⚠️
...sql/src/compile/rewrite/rules/wrapper/aggregate.rs	95.61%	16 Missing ⚠️
rust/cubesql/cubesql/src/transport/ext.rs	74.46%	12 Missing ⚠️
...t/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/engine/udf/common.rs	87.75%	6 Missing ⚠️
rust/cubesql/cubesql/src/compile/rewrite/mod.rs	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9218      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.57%   83.63%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         227      227              
  Lines       81627    82388     +761     
==========================================
+ Hits        68216    68905     +689     
- Misses      13411    13483      +72     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cubesql	83.63% <91.67%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[waralexrom]

Let's at least add the word Path to the name of the patchedFrom field (ideally, of course, make it a structure with cubeName and Name). Otherwise, every time we come across such a code fragment, we will have to go to the patchedMeasure definition to understand what patchedFrom and its 0th and 1st elements represent