This is the official implementation for our paper in ACL: Exploring Defeasibility in Causal Reasoning
Defeasibility in causal reasoning implies that the causal relationship between cause and effect can be strengthened or weakened. Namely, the causal strength between cause and effect should increase or decrease with the incorporation of strengthening arguments (supporters) or weakening arguments (defeaters), respectively. However, existing works ignore defeasibility in causal reasoning and fail to evaluate existing causal strength metrics in defeasible settings. In this work, we present
delta-causal-dataset/*
: the final dataset.data_analysis/*
: analysis for our collected dataset.cesar_metric/*
: the metric for causal strength.evaluation_metrics/*
: existing evaluation metrics.metrics_outputs/*
: the outputs of existing metrics on causal strength and CESAR.defeasibility_generation/*
: code for defeasibility generation.
If you want to cite our dataset and paper, you can use this BibTex:
@inproceedings{cui-etal-2024-exploring,
title = "Exploring Defeasibility in Causal Reasoning",
author = "Cui, Shaobo and
Milikic, Lazar and
Feng, Yiyang and
Ismayilzada, Mete and
Paul, Debjit and
Bosselut, Antoine and
Faltings, Boi",
editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and
Martins, Andre and
Srikumar, Vivek",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-acl.384",
pages = "6433--6452",
}