-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add or change k8s v1.27 #54
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please update the package version in go.mod and go version.
@@ -497,6 +498,7 @@ kind: Pod` | |||
}) | |||
|
|||
It("should recreate the service resource when the service resource is deleted", func() { | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this empty line intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not, I will delete this line.
k8s.io/api v0.28.3 | ||
k8s.io/apimachinery v0.28.3 | ||
k8s.io/client-go v0.28.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is desirable to use the latest version of 0.27.Z for these three packages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It had automatically updated due to depend on the version of the runtime-controller.
}}, | ||
expected: []statusResponse{ | ||
{Jobs: []job{{Name: "test1", Status: "Failed"}, {Name: "test2", Status: "Pending"}}}, | ||
{Jobs: []job{{Name: "test7", Status: "Failed"}, {Name: "test8", Status: "Pending"}}}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you make the test names a sequential number?
I thought there would be no problem if Name was unique within each []Job
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it is unesessary update, but it bring us easy identify test reult when we confuse which case failed.
Co-authored-by: kouki kamada <kouworld0123@gmail.com>
No description provided.