-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
[quick PR] 1 line fix in gql.fix bookmark_folders_slice due to malformed variables #334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
variables was redeclared with nested variables. this caused an infinite loop on next() calls as the variables were ignored due to being malformed.
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request fixes an issue in the Sequence diagram for bookmark_folders_slice methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GQL
Client->>Client: cursor is not None
Client->>Client: variables['cursor'] = cursor
Client->>GQL: gql_get(Endpoint.BOOKMARK_FOLDERS_SLICE, variables)
GQL-->>Client: Response
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe change simplifies the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor Client
participant GQLClient
participant gql_get
Client->>GQLClient: bookmark_folders_slice(cursor)
GQLClient->>GQLClient: Construct variables dictionary (based on cursor)
GQLClient->>gql_get: Call gql_get(variables)
gql_get-->>GQLClient: Return result
GQLClient-->>Client: Return result
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @the-vampiire - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Thanks for fixing this tricky bug!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
1 line fix, closes #335
variables was redeclared with nested variables. this caused an infinite loop on next() calls as the variables were ignored due to being malformed.
really tough one to trace down. checked if it happened anywhere else and thankfully it does not.
thanks for the lib
Summary by Sourcery
Bug Fixes:
Summary by CodeRabbit