-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
Unpack list-conversation entries in get_list_tweets #340
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request modifies the Sequence diagram for get_list_tweets with list-conversation entriessequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant handle_item
Client->>API: get_list_tweets(list_id, count, next_cursor)
API->>API: Fetch items
loop For each item in items
alt item['entryId'].startsWith('tweet')
API->>handle_item: handle_item(item)
handle_item->>API: tweet = tweet_from_data(item)
alt tweet is not None
API->>API: results.append(tweet)
end
else item['entryId'].startsWith('list-conversation')
API->>API: Unpack item['content']['items']
loop For each sub_item in item['content']['items']
API->>handle_item: handle_item(sub_item)
handle_item->>API: tweet = tweet_from_data(sub_item)
alt tweet is not None
API->>API: results.append(tweet)
end
end
end
end
API-->>Client: Result(results, next_cursor)
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe update restructures the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant H as handle_item
participant I as Item
loop For each item in list
C->>I: Check entryId
alt entryId starts with "tweet"
I->>H: Process tweet item
else entryId starts with "list-conversation"
I->>C: Return nested items
loop For each nested item
C->>H: Process nested tweet item
end
end
end
C->>C: Return Result with tweets & pagination
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ruizie - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider renaming
handle_item
toextract_tweet_from_item
to better reflect its purpose.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
elif item['entryId'].startswith('list-conversation'): | ||
for item in item['content']['items']: | ||
handle_item(item) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Avoid shadowing the 'item' variable in the inner loop.
The inner loop reuses the name 'item' which shadows the outer 'item'. This could lead to confusion when reading the code. Consider renaming the inner loop variable (e.g., to 'sub_item') for clarity.
elif item['entryId'].startswith('list-conversation'): | |
for item in item['content']['items']: | |
handle_item(item) | |
elif item['entryId'].startswith('list-conversation'): | |
for sub_item in item['content']['items']: | |
handle_item(sub_item) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
twikit/client/client.py (1)
3600-3611
: Fix variable naming in nested loops to prevent confusion.The helper function
handle_item
is a good improvement that centralizes tweet processing logic, but there's an issue with the inner loop variable name. The inner loop on line 3609 uses the same variable nameitem
as the outer loop, which can lead to confusion and potential bugs.Apply this diff to improve clarity:
def handle_item(item): tweet = tweet_from_data(self, item) if tweet is not None: results.append(tweet) for item in items: if item['entryId'].startswith('tweet'): handle_item(item) elif item['entryId'].startswith('list-conversation'): - for item in item['content']['items']: - handle_item(item) + for sub_item in item['content']['items']: + handle_item(sub_item)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
3609-3609: Loop control variable
item
overrides iterable it iterates(B020)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
twikit/client/client.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
twikit/client/client.py
3609-3609: Loop control variable item
overrides iterable it iterates
(B020)
Similarly to #337, do the same for list handling.
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements:
Summary by CodeRabbit