Consider adding a new abstract property output_dimension to UQTestFunABC class
#345
Comments
damar-wicaksono
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Introduce the `output_dimension` property for UQ test functions and update related tests and documentations. Furthermore, the high-level function `list_functions()` is updated to display additional information related to output dimension and parameterization in grid format. This commit should resolve Issue #345.
damar-wicaksono
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Introduce the `output_dimension` property for UQ test functions and update related tests and documentations. Furthermore, the high-level function `list_functions()` is updated to display additional information related to output dimension and parameterization in grid format. This commit should resolve Issue #345.
damar-wicaksono
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Introduce the `output_dimension` property for UQ test functions and update related tests and documentations. Furthermore, the high-level function `list_functions()` is updated to display additional information related to output dimension and parameterization in grid format. This commit should resolve Issue #345.
|
This issue has been resoled by PR #370. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Many test functions in UQ literature prescribe multiple outputs such that for a given realization of input values, an array of values is returned (e.g., a time series).
This information can be stored in a new abstract property called
output_dimension. Consider adding this property to the abstract base class.PS: It may be the case that the output dimension is itself more than one dimension (e.g., think of an image instead of a time-series). The updated class should accommodate this situation as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: