feat(research): Add reliability features - validation, confidence, logging #163
+765
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ce scoring, structured logging This PR implements research reliability features originally proposed in PR danielmiessler#82, adapted for v0.9.1 architecture with TitleCase naming and ${PAI_DIR} variables. ## New Reference Files ### ValidationGates.md - 3-gate validation system (Source, Confidence, Contradiction) - Automated quality verification before final delivery - Pass/warn/fail thresholds with clear criteria - Integration guidance for all research modes ### ConfidenceScoring.md - Transparent 4-factor confidence algorithm - Weighted factors: Source Quality (30%), Source Count (25%), Agent Agreement (25%), Specificity (20%) - Score interpretation bands (Very High to Very Low) - Worked examples showing calculation ### ResearchLogging.md - Structured JSON logging schema for research execution - Integration with existing capture-all-events.ts hook - Query examples for observability dashboard - Privacy and security guidelines ## Updated Files ### SKILL.md - Added workflow routing for validation, confidence, and logging - Added Reference Files table documenting new files - Updated workflow file references to TitleCase ### workflows/Conduct.md - Added Step 4: Validate Research Quality - Quick validation checklist for all research modes - Confidence scoring summary with thresholds - Validation output template for reports ## Benefits - Improved research reliability through automated validation - Transparent confidence scoring users can verify - Enhanced observability for debugging and analytics - Follows progressive disclosure pattern (reference files loaded on-demand) ## TAC Alignment Implements TAC Tactic danielmiessler#5: Add Feedback - self-correcting systems that validate their own work with transparent, algorithmic quality assessment. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Resubmission of PR #82 reliability features, adapted for v0.9.1 architecture.
New Files
ValidationGates.md- 3-gate quality validation systemConfidenceScoring.md- 4-factor confidence algorithmResearchLogging.md- Structured execution loggingUpdated Files
SKILL.md- Added routing for new reference filesworkflows/Conduct.md- Added Step 4: Validate Research QualityKey Features
Benefits