Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.297 #247
renovate[bot]Annotations
7 errors and 13 warnings
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L66
Promise returned in function argument where a void return was expected
|
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L66
Unsafe argument of type `any` assigned to a parameter of type `Record<string, any> | PromiseLike<Record<string, any>>`
|
|
build (16.x)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
build (18.x)
The job was canceled because "_16_x" failed.
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L66
Promise returned in function argument where a void return was expected
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L66
Unsafe argument of type `any` assigned to a parameter of type `Record<string, any> | PromiseLike<Record<string, any>>`
|
|
build (18.x)
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
|
build (16.x)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
|
|
build (16.x):
background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (16.x):
content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (16.x):
content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
|
|
build (18.x):
background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (18.x):
content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|
|
build (18.x):
content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
|