Encrypt uploaded files, store them wherever you like and stream them back unencrypted.
It's increasingly common to use products like S3 to host static files, but sometimes those static files aren't exactly meant for public eyes. You might push some bit of personal information into S3 and then anyone with the URL will be able to see it.
Sure, the URL may be really hard to guess, but I'm not a fan of "security
through obscurity" so I wrote this to encrypt stuff I push to S3. Now, only
encrypted blobs are available publicly, but internally, behind a
MyPermissionRequiredMixin
, the images and documents are loaded magically
and transparently.
EncryptedFileField
is a thin wrapper around Django's native FileField
that transparently encrypts whatever the user has uploaded and passes off the
now encrypted data to whatever storage engine you've specified. It also
overrides the .url
value to return a reference to your own view, which does
the decryption for you on the way back to the user.
So where you may have once had this:
# my_app/models.py
class MyModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
attachment = models.FileField(upload_to="attachments")
image = models.ImageField(
upload_to="images",
width_field="image_width",
height_field="image_height"
)
image_width = models.PositiveIntegerField()
image_height = models.PositiveIntegerField()
All you have to do is change the file fields and you've got encrypted files
# my_app/models.py
from django_encrypted_filefield.fields import (
EncryptedFileField,
EncryptedImageField
)
class MyModel(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
attachment = EncryptedFileField(upload_to="attachments")
image = EncryptedImageField(
upload_to="images",
width_field="image_width",
height_field="image_height"
)
image_width = models.PositiveIntegerField()
image_height = models.PositiveIntegerField()
# my_app/views.py
from django.contrib.auth.mixins import AuthMixin
from django_encrypted_filefield.views import FetchView
class MyPermissionRequiredMixin(AuthMixin)
"""
Your own rules live here
"""
pass
class MyFetchView(MyPermissionRequiredMixin, FetchView):
pass
# my_app/urls.py
from django_encrypted_filefield.constants import FETCH_URL_NAME
from myapp.views import MyFetchView
urlpatterns = [
# ...
url(
r"^my-fetch-url/(?P<path>.+)", # up to you, but path is required
MyFetchView.as_view(), # your view, your permissions
name=FETCH_URL_NAME
),
# ...
]
Configuration of the package requires setting three values in either the
environment (recommended) or in your settings.py
. These values are:
DEFF_SALT
: The salt value use for generating the synchronous encryptionDEFF_PASSWORD
: The password value for the same thingDEFF_FETCH_URL_NAME
: The named URL you intend to use to download the files as they're decrypted on-the-fly.
Outside of that, follow the above and you should be good to go.
As this project depends on the setting of three environment variables, you have to set these for the tests. Also, the tests are expecting these values, so don't change them:
$ DEFF_SALT="salt" DEFF_PASSWORD="password" DEFF_FETCH_URL_NAME="fetch" ./manage.py test
There is! Just check out the code and run the mini django app in the demo
directory:
$ git clone git@github.com:danielquinn/django-encrypted-filefield.git
$ cd django-encrypted-filefield/demo
$ export DEFF_SALT="salt"
$ export DEFF_PASSWORD="password"
$ export DEFF_FETCH_URL_NAME="fetch"
$ ./manage migrate
$ ./manage.py runserver
...then open http://localhost:8000 and submit two files via the form. In this case we're using Django's default_storage, but the same logic should apply to all storage engines.
Since the file changes just before it's saved, you can't apply a validator
that acts on the contents of the file. For example, if you've got a validator
that uses mime-magic to determine the file type, it will always return
text/plain
which, unless that's what you're checking for, will break your
validation. To make things more interesting, Django appears to apply
validation on field values on every save, not just when the field has
changed, so even if the validator were to work on the first run, whenever you
would update the object in the admin, your validator will barf in this case.
Stable. I'm actively using it in a production environment now and have been for some time without issue. This isn't a guarantee that it'll work for everyone in every case of course, but it's enough for me to use that word :-)