Condition monitoring - Initial additions to align with the format #61
Conversation
| "source": [ | ||
| "#Separating the main metrics and additional metrics into different tables for further analysis\n", | ||
| "\n", | ||
| "metrics = pd.DataFrame(list(zip(final['Data_y'][3],\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add vibration plots for inner and outer ring damages.
For the issue #59 |
| "id": "ec9855e8-7e9c-4005-a25d-3433086e35a0", | ||
| "metadata": {}, | ||
| "source": [ | ||
| "### EDA using data-describe" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As discussed, please add the visualization comparison for extent of damage for:
1) Artificial Damage - Table 4
Try to see the comparison between KA03 and KA05. Since both damage methods are electric engraver but the extent damage level is different. We want to get a sense of vibration deviation for these levels
2) Real Damage - Table 5
Check comparison for KA04 and KA16. Both have same damage type (Fatigue, pitting) but different damage levels.
Note: Just a caution, to make sure we are comparing apples to apples. 1 and 2 are for Outer Ring elements. Inner ring damages will exhibit different behaviour from OR.
| ### Dataset | ||
| ### Paderborn Bearing Dataset | ||
|
|
||
| Our dataset of Interest(Paderborn Bearing Dataset) consists the following details: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add experimental setup diagram -
Figure 4 - Modular Test Ring
https://mb.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/kat/PDF/Veroeffentlichungen/20160703_PHME16_CM_bearing.pdf
slightly changed the structure of readme file.
For the issue #59 |
4 participants
Tasks performed to align the conditional monitoring project with the format of other projects
This is a pull request for the issue #59