-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Quality Requirements
This section contains all quality requirements as quality tree with scenarios. The most important ones have already been described in section 3. (quality goals)
Here you can also capture quality requirements with lesser priority, which will not create high risks when they are not fully achieved.
Since quality requirements will have a lot of influence on architectural decisions you should know for every stakeholder what is really important to them, concrete and measurable.
The quality tree (as defined in ATAM -- Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method) with quality/evaluation scenarios as leafs.
The tree structure with priorities provides an overview for a sometimes large number of quality requirements.
The quality tree is a high-level overview of the quality goals and requirements:
- tree-like refinement of the term "quality". Use "quality" or "usefulness" as a root
- a mind map with quality categories as main branches
In any case the tree should include links to the scenarios of the following section.
PASTE IMAGE OF QUALITY TREE HERE
Concretization of (sometimes vague or implicit) quality requirements using (quality) scenarios.
These scenarios describe what should happen when a stimulus arrives at the system.
For architects, two kinds of scenarios are important:
- Usage scenarios (also called application scenarios or use case scenarios) describe the system's runtime reaction to a certain stimulus. This also includes scenarios that describe the system's efficiency or performance. Example: The system reacts to a user's request within one second.
- Change scenarios describe a modification of the system or of its immediate environment. Example: Additional functionality is implemented or requirements for a quality attribute change.
Scenarios make quality requirements concrete and allow to more easily measure or decide whether they are fulfilled.
Especially when you want to assess your architecture using methods like ATAM you need to describe your quality goals (from section 3) more precisely down to a level of scenarios that can be discussed and evaluated.
ID | Scenario |
---|---|
P01 | ... |
Us01 | ... |
README | Contributing | Code of Conduct | Support | Funding | Security | License |
- Home of the Wiki
- Roadmap
- API Reference
- Glossary
- Contributor Guide
- Code of Conduct
- Support
- Funding
- Security
- License
- Description of Core Essence
- Cost Estimates
- Staffing Estimates
- Predicted Benefits
- Risks
- Scheduled Milestones
- Definition of Ready
- Definition of Done
- Project Decisions
- Technological Decisions
- Sprint Reviews
- Sprint Retrospectives
- Continuous Integration
- Continuous Deployment
- Operations Troubleshooting
- External Systems
- Style Guide
- Specific Views
- View 1
- ...
- About
- Introduction and Goals
- Constraints
- Context
- Solution Strategy
- Building Block View
- Runtime View
- Deployment View
- Cross Cutting Concepts
- Design Decisions
- ADRXX Template
- ...
- Quality Requirements
- Risks and Technical Debt
- Glossary
- Reference Manuals
- Support Guides
- Release Notes