Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump kotlin-stdlib-common from 1.7.10 to 1.7.20 in /data-prepper-plugins/mapdb-prepper-state #215

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 1, 2022

Bumps kotlin-stdlib-common from 1.7.10 to 1.7.20.

Release notes

Sourced from kotlin-stdlib-common's releases.

Kotlin 1.7.20

1.7.20

Analysis API

  • KT-52667 FIR IDE: fun interfaces (SAM interfaces) are not properly resolved
  • KT-52136 FIR: Implicit type declaration from the other module cannot be used for overloading

Analysis API. FE1.0

  • KT-51962 Analysis API: Finish Analysis API for FE1.0

Analysis API. FIR

  • KT-52779 FIR IDE: Import Optimizer cannot handle generic type qualifiers
  • KT-50236 Fix OOB modification trackers for non-Kotlin code
  • KT-51240 Analysis API: KtAnalysisSession for a specific module cannot create a symbol for PSI that cannot be seen from that module.
  • KT-50868 Analysis API: decompiled type aliases are not resolved

Compiler

  • KT-53739 Builder inference, extension hides members
  • KT-53733 Kotlin/Native: update source documentation for the new default memory manager
  • KT-53667 Compiler crashes on attempt to alloc a string on the stack in new MM
  • KT-53480 Internal error in file lowering: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.android.systemui.R$string
  • KT-52843 Compose: NPE at Parameters.getParameterByDeclarationSlot if inline function with default arguments takes a lambda which captures value class represented by Long
  • KT-51868 JVM / IR: Inconsistent behaviour between lambda expression and SAM interface conversion for the same interface
  • KT-53475 Kotlin/Native for iOS: "IllegalArgumentException: Sequence has more than one element"

New Features

  • KT-52495 Support until operator in back-ends
  • KT-52420 Implement resolve of until operator
  • KT-52419 Implement until operator in the parser
    • KT-33755 Kotlin/Native: Provide a way to customize a bundle Identifier of a generated framework
  • KT-51665 FIR: implement label resolve for "typed this" case
  • KT-52361 Report warning on potentially empty intersection types

Performance Improvements

  • KT-47816 Disable script discovery for non-script environments
  • KT-48635 JVM IR: Double/Float values are boxed when comparing for equality in equals method of data/value classes
  • KT-23397 Optimize out field for property delegate when it's safe (JVM)

Fixes

  • KT-53272 Backend Internal error: Exception during IR lowering / No such value argument slot: 2
  • KT-53124 Receiver type mismatch when combining extension properties, type projections, Java sources, and F-bounded type-variables
  • KT-51868 JVM / IR: Inconsistent behaviour between lambda expression and SAM interface conversion for the same interface
  • KT-36770 Prohibit unsafe calls with expected @NotNull T and given Kotlin generic parameter with nullable bound
  • KT-52974 "IllegalStateException: Symbol with IrSimpleFunctionSymbolImpl is unbound" compiling native targets of MPP project

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from kotlin-stdlib-common's changelog.

1.7.20

Compiler

New Features

  • KT-52495 Support until operator in back-ends
  • KT-52420 Implement resolve of until operator
  • KT-52419 Implement until operator in the parser

Fixes

  • KT-53947 IllegalStateException: No mapping for symbol: VALUE_PARAMETER INSTANCE_RECEIVER
  • KT-51234 Context receivers can be duplicated in function declaration
  • KT-51576 Context receivers: "AssertionError: Callers must check that current token is IDENTIFIER followed with '@'" with at character
  • KT-49479 JVM / IR: "IllegalStateException: IrErrorType" during IR lowering with non-trivial recursion calls
  • KT-52270 NullPointerException caused by braces on if-else returning a method reference inside lambda
  • KT-47621 False negative INVISIBLE_MEMBER on call to inaccessible protected synthetic property setter
  • KT-37796 NI: "ISE: Error type encountered" when inferring type of a property that delegates to itself
  • KT-45430 PSI2IR: "org.jetbrains.kotlin.psi2ir.generators.ErrorExpressionException: null: KtCallExpression: toString()" with recursive function call in "also" block in nontrivial context
  • KT-52691 K2: Expected FirResolvedTypeRef with ConeKotlinType but was FirImplicitTypeRefImpl with intertwined functional interfaces
  • KT-52822 Fix contract for KtElement.getReference()
  • KT-50223 IndexOutOfBoundsException from ClassicTypeSystemContext$DefaultImpls.getParameter during call resolution
  • KT-51963 Change Maven version to 1.7.255
  • KT-47664 Incorrect type checking in the case of generic types
  • KT-48765 NI: Inferred type does not respect the bound of type variable
  • KT-51243 False positive error "No required context receiver" inside contextual lambda
  • KT-43541 TYPE_MISMATCH for member function which is not occur for top level function during unsafe cast
  • KT-51016 [FIR] False positive OVERLOAD_RESOLUTION_AMBIGUITY between two extensions on different supertypes
  • KT-50155 FIR: support contextual receivers
  • KT-38637 Catch NoSuchFieldException in optimized when expression over enum

Docs & Examples

  • KT-49896 Kotlin/JS: improve -Xir-property-lazy-initialization description due to making it true by default

IDE

  • KTIJ-22286 Kotlin JPS project created via wizard does not contain Kotlin libraries in case of not-released version
  • KTIJ-22065 IDE notification motivating Kotlin users to use EAP
  • KTIJ-22209 Configure Kotlin on 221 idea adds 1.6.10 Kotlin (despite the fact that IDE plugin is 1.7.10)
  • KTIJ-22171 Fix test BuiltInDecompilerConsistencyTest
  • KTIJ-22016 Empty .kt file and build.gradle.kts can trigger an error while searching for a facade light class

IDE. Code Style, Formatting

  • KTIJ-21346 Incorrect formatting for functions with context receivers and visibility modifiers

IDE. Completion

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 7159702 Add changelog for 1.7.20
  • 9ca25ce Native: add more tests for Swift Set and Dictionary used in Kotlin
  • 1244679 Native: improve thread state switches for NSSet/NSDictionary adapters
  • 1abfeb9 [Gradle][MPP] MPP/AGP compatibility: Bump maxSupportedVersion to 7.3
  • b489e93 Fix lowering of receiver access in IR scripting
  • 8a8853c K1. Fix error message for BUILDER_INFERENCE_MULTI_LAMBDA_RESTRICTION
  • 608d45c Add changelog for 1.7.20-RC
  • 3a340d2 Fix kind of NoBuilderInferenceWithoutAnnotationRestriction
  • a17fc51 Fix receiver inconsistency when builder inference restriction disabled
  • f0fd2cf Put back the line with language feature to 1.7 block
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [kotlin-stdlib-common](https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin) from 1.7.10 to 1.7.20.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin/blob/v1.7.20/ChangeLog.md)
- [Commits](JetBrains/kotlin@v1.7.10...v1.7.20)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-common
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Oct 1, 2022
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 3, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

13 similar comments
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 3, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 4, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 5, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 5, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 6, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 7, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 13, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 19, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Oct 20, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 8, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 10, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 12, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 19, 2022

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 4, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

10 similar comments
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 13, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 21, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 24, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 30, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 2, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 8, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 8, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 8, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 10, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 14, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 14, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

8 similar comments
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 16, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 27, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 1, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 7, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 17, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 25, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 29, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 1, 2023

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 7, 2023

OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting @dependabot ignore this major version or @dependabot ignore this minor version.

If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it.

@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/gradle/data-prepper-plugins/mapdb-prepper-state/org.jetbrains.kotlin-kotlin-stdlib-common-1.7.20 branch December 7, 2023 16:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant