Better naming for UNIX socket function #126
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lexdene
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
|
Ok, I just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. Thank you for testing it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original wording is ambiguous; all relevant sockets are local, the AF_UNIX type is the difference.
Also, #120 bumped the version in the code to
1.4.3and #125 bumped to1.4.4but the current HEAD is tagged1.4.3and #120 doesn't have a version tag. The version bump for this PR should bring it to1.4.5.