Sweet16 #49
Sweet16 #49
Conversation
- draft scheduler, artifact IO, cache key, ledger, spill/merge, byte budget, and ordering specs - mark Phase 16.0 spec tasks complete in SWEET16 roadmap
- disable max-lines lint rule to allow larger pipeline changes - feed raw argv into build-embeddings config for scheduler resolution - add embeddings scheduler helper + per-file embedding pipeline - wire Stage3 embeddings compute/IO through scheduler queues with backpressure fallback - gate cache/artifact IO via scheduler queues and log starvation counts - add perf test for embeddings scheduler backpressure and update SWEET16 roadmap - document embeddings scheduler queues in concurrency/runtime and perf audit specs
- add file_meta cache key metadata and spec - apply unified cache keys to import-resolution and VFS caches - invalidate import cache on file set changes and add regression test - document cache key usage in VFS specs and roadmap touchpoints
- pass bounded concurrency to JSONL array loads - fall back to full scan when per-file index is invalid - mark Phase 16.2.4 loader tasks complete
- add artifact-io-read benchmark for parallel JSONL loads - extend jsonl-offset-index to support real index paths - mark Phase 16.2.5 bench tasks complete
- version cache root by cache key schema and purge legacy layouts - add cache-rebuild CLI/env flag and cache migration test - add tooling cache eviction and clear-cache command - update config schema and cache specs
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a8a642cc7e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex pls review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 093930f51a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
1 participant
Summary
Checklist