Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: using slices.Contains to simplify the code #2695

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

petercover
Copy link

@petercover petercover commented Jan 22, 2025

Changelist

This is a new function added in the go1.21 standard library, which can make the code more concise and easy to read.

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified the logic for checking allowed execution modes using a more concise method.

Signed-off-by: petercover <raowanxiang@outlook.com>
@petercover petercover requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 16:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor optimization in the protocol/lib/metrics/lib.go file. The isAllowedExecutionMode function has been refactored to use the slices.Contains function, replacing a manual loop-based approach for checking if an execution mode is allowed. This change simplifies the code by leveraging a standard library function to perform the slice containment check more concisely.

Changes

File Change Summary
protocol/lib/metrics/lib.go Replaced manual loop with slices.Contains() for checking allowed execution modes

Suggested labels

protocol

Suggested reviewers

  • vincentwschau

Poem

🐰 A slice of code, a rabbit's delight,
With slices.Contains(), logic burns bright
No more loops to weave and wind
Simplicity now, elegantly refined
Code hops faster, clean and light! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 518a769 and 692d2bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • protocol/lib/metrics/lib.go (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
protocol/lib/metrics/lib.go (2)

102-102: Great simplification using slices.Contains!

The refactor improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality. This is a good use of the standard library's slices.Contains function and follows idiomatic Go practices.


4-4: Verify Go version compatibility.

The slices package was introduced in Go 1.21. Please ensure that the project's minimum Go version requirement is compatible with this change.

Run this script to check the Go version:

✅ Verification successful

Go version is compatible with slices package usage

The project uses Go 1.23.1, which is well above the minimum required version (Go 1.21) for using the slices package.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Go version requirements in go.mod and CI configuration

# Check go.mod
echo "Checking go.mod for Go version:"
fd -t f "go.mod$" -x cat {}

# Check CI configuration for Go version
echo -e "\nChecking CI configuration for Go version:"
fd -t f "^\.github/workflows/.*ya?ml$" -x cat {}

Length of output: 25486

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant