Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #878 from FCLC/Words_are_hard
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
add description for EasyBuild Tech Talk on AVX10
  • Loading branch information
boegel authored Sep 12, 2023
2 parents bd7fde0 + c72804d commit fa1d404
Showing 1 changed file with 19 additions and 2 deletions.
21 changes: 19 additions & 2 deletions tech-talks/008_avx10.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,17 +12,34 @@
<header>
<h1 align="center"><img align="center" alt="EasyBuild" src="../images/easybuild_logo_small.png"/></h1><br/>
<h4 align="center" style="color:#cccccc">EasyBuild Tech Talks VIII</h4>
<h2 align="center" style="color:#ffffff">AVX10 for HPC, a reasonable solution to the folly of AVX-512</h2>
<h2 align="center" style="color:#ffffff">AVX10 for HPC:
A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly </h2>
<h4 align="center" style="color:#cccccc">Felix LeClair - Fri 13 Oct 2023</h4>
</header>
<section>
<em><h4>Talk description</h4></em>
<p>
...
HPC has been using Same Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) paradigms to increase the performance of machines, libraries and codes since the early Cray Vector processors. This talk provides a historical overview of x86 SIMD from the 90's to modern and unreleased processors in the form of AVX10, specifically its impact within High Performance Computing.

Focusing on HPC, this talk is targeted on two primary demographics: Those in HPC packaging/system administration as well as those in HPC Compiler/Library optimization.
The end goal of this talk is to demystify AVX in all its forms, from the HPC focused AVX1, the general workload focused AVX2, and the 7 different, non-overlapping levels of AVX-512, and a return to normality with AVX10. HPC stands to benefit from AVX10 not by having new instructions, but rather by setting a new common baseline that developers, administrators and users can universally target without having had to run their own assembly routines prior to moving from one cluster to another.
</p>
<p>
Outline of the talk:
<ul>
In the beginning, there was x87, and we've universally agreed this was a bad idea
MMX: Look mum! I can do two things at once!
SSE1-2: Now I can do 4 things, and operate on real data types!
SSE3-4.2: I can do 4 things, and now I can manipulate *how* I do them
AVX1: 256 bits of floating point action, time for maths to fly
AVX2: You get an integer! You get an interger! Everbody get's an integer
AVX-512 Part 1: They were the best of times, they were the worst of times.
AVX-512 Part 2: *And then things went very, very wrong*
AVX-512 Part 3: *Why yes, I too would like 5 more spec expantions without contiguous supersets*
AVX10.1/512: Ok, let's make all of the AVX-512 thing less of a PITA
AVX10.1/256: Ok, let's make all of the AVX-512 goodies available for consumers
AVX10.1/128: Ok, let's ruin all of the progress of AVX10

<li>...</li>
</ul>
</p>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit fa1d404

Please sign in to comment.