Add note about default DWO installation namespace#3034
Open
dkwon17 wants to merge 4 commits intoeclipse-che:mainfrom
Open
Add note about default DWO installation namespace#3034dkwon17 wants to merge 4 commits intoeclipse-che:mainfrom
dkwon17 wants to merge 4 commits intoeclipse-che:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dkwon17 <dakwon@redhat.com>
dkwon17
requested review from
a team,
deerskindoll,
gtrivedi88 and
mkuznyetsov
as code owners
|
⚡️ Deploying pull request preview... |
|
Click here to review and test in web IDE: |
-525C86?logo=eclipse-che&labelColor=red){kind=icon}
rohanKanojia
reviewed
Mar 6, 2026
modules/administration-guide/pages/devworkspace-backup-regular-oci-registry.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gtrivedi88
reviewed
Mar 6, 2026
| schedule: '0 */4 * * *' # cron expression with backup frequency | ||
| imagePullPolicy: Always | ||
| ---- | ||
| <1> The default {devworkspace} Operator installation namespace is `openshift-operators`. See xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} Operator overview]. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| <1> The default {devworkspace} Operator installation namespace is `openshift-operators`. See xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} Operator overview]. | |
| <1> The default installation namespace for the Red Hat OpenShift operator is `openshift-operators`. See the xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} operator overview]. |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gtrivedi88 I updated the wording in my latest commit, could you please take another look?
The sentence: The default installation namespace for the Red Hat OpenShift operator is a bit unclear, because it doesn't specify which operator, so instead, I kept {devworkspace} Operator, WDYT?
gtrivedi88
reviewed
Mar 6, 2026
| schedule: '0 */4 * * *' | ||
| imagePullPolicy: Always | ||
| ---- | ||
| <1> The default {devworkspace} Operator installation namespace is `openshift-operators`. See xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} Operator overview]. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| <1> The default {devworkspace} Operator installation namespace is `openshift-operators`. See xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} Operator overview]. | |
| <1> The default installation namespace for the Red Hat OpenShift operator is `openshift-operators`. See the xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} operator overview]. |
gtrivedi88
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
dkwon17
force-pushed
the
default-dwo-namespace
branch
from
0bc0bad to
88e9f93
Compare
Signed-off-by: dkwon17 <dakwon@redhat.com>
rohanKanojia
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
ibuziuk
reviewed
Mar 9, 2026
| schedule: '0 */4 * * *' # cron expression with backup frequency | ||
| imagePullPolicy: Always | ||
| ---- | ||
| <1> For OpenShift, the default {devworkspace} Operator installation namespace is `openshift-operators`. See xref:devworkspace-operator.adoc#devworkspace-operator[{devworkspace} Operator overview]. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dkwon17 should we also have a warning about the fact that all operators must be installed in the same namespace - similar to https://github.com/eclipse-che/che-docs/pull/2688/changes
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMHO I don't think it's necessary here, since this page is not about operation installations
gtrivedi88
reviewed
Mar 9, 2026
modules/administration-guide/pages/devworkspace-backup-integrated-openshift-registry.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gtrivedi88
reviewed
Mar 9, 2026
modules/administration-guide/pages/devworkspace-backup-regular-oci-registry.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
gtrivedi88
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2026
…-oci-registry.adoc Co-authored-by: Gaurav Trivedi <90042568+gtrivedi88@users.noreply.github.com>
…ted-openshift-registry.adoc Co-authored-by: Gaurav Trivedi <90042568+gtrivedi88@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this pull request change?
Adds a note mentioning the default DWO install namespace:
What issues does this pull request fix or reference?
N/A
Specify the version of the product this pull request applies to
DS 3.27
Pull Request checklist
The author and the reviewers validate the content of this pull request with the following checklist, in addition to the automated tests.
Validate language on files added or modifiedstep reports no vale warnings.