-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial example for testing slow subscribers #127
Initial example for testing slow subscribers #127
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #127 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.11% 60.10% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 33 33
Lines 16191 16192 +1
==========================================
Hits 9733 9733
- Misses 6458 6459 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Only problem again the high level Cargo.lock that is updated the one under lib shall be kept.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The example shows a subscriber which is intentionally slow in receiving updates.
When running in parallel with kuksa-perf, there are too many updates of the signal which the slow subscriber will not be able to keep up with and will start throwing away signal updates. When this happens, the channel on the databroker side will log a warning message and indicate how many signal updates were lost for the slow subscriber.