Skip to content

remove double link#362

Merged
AlexanderLanin merged 5 commits intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:remove_double_comp_req_link
Jan 26, 2026
Merged

remove double link#362
AlexanderLanin merged 5 commits intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:remove_double_comp_req_link

Conversation

@RolandJentschETAS
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Description

remove double link (is already linked from req to comp)

🚨 Impact Analysis

  • This change does not violate any tool requirements and is covered by existing tool requirements
  • This change does not violate any design decisions
  • Otherwise I have created a ticket for new tool qualification

✅ Checklist

  • Added/updated documentation for new or changed features
  • Added/updated tests to cover the changes
  • Followed project coding standards and guidelines

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2026

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //src:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 102e5e1f-ab75-4b78-8ffc-1300c61573f1
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: src
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //src:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (65 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (113 packages loaded, 735 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (129 packages loaded, 2435 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //src:license-check (134 packages loaded, 2484 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //src:license-check (137 packages loaded, 4500 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //src:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 12.714s, Critical Path: 0.36s
INFO: 13 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/src/license.check.license_check src/formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

# req-Id: tool_req__docs_common_attr_status
status: ^(valid|invalid)$
optional_links:
fulfils: comp_req
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this picture is still correct, then a 'includes' where 'comp' is allowed is missing here too right?
Or is that the 'consists_of' link here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@RolandJentschETAS RolandJentschETAS Jan 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is the "consists_of". The picture in the process have to be adopted. There is a parallel PR in the process area for this.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

picture was updated

AlexanderLanin
AlexanderLanin previously approved these changes Jan 23, 2026
@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin merged commit f784d43 into eclipse-score:main Jan 26, 2026
14 checks passed
@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin deleted the remove_double_comp_req_link branch January 26, 2026 12:21
arnoox pushed a commit to arnoox/score-docs-as-code that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
arnoox pushed a commit to arnoox/score-docs-as-code that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants