REVIEW

[acocac]

Hi 👋

Thanks authors and reviewers to contribute to the Climate Informatics 2023 Reproducibility Challenge ✨

The review PR aims to facilitate discussion how to improve the notebook via ReviewNB, a third-party plugin in GitHub for displaying and commenting Jupyter Notebooks. Find further details here.

Authors: please reply reviewers comments in a timely manner and push changes in this PR. You'll see ReviewNB easily renders Jupyter Notebook rich diffs than GitHub (see here).

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

👈 Test this PR on Binder

[NHomer-Edi]

I have commented on the ReviewNB, but here are some more general comments:
Well executed and documented (inline and markdown) notebook, which has a clear purpose and runs well locally. Clearly fits within the scope of the Environmental DS Book.

• Notebook doesn't successfully run on Binder, for me (not the author's fault) EDIT: I did eventually get the notebook to run on Binder
• References to data sources and acronyms should be added
• Some more discussion around your choice of default parametrs (e.g. LR, batch sizes etc.) would be beneficial
• Add some more information about the limitations of your methods (albeit there is little discussion of limitations in the paper) ( Add truthful and clear limitations of the analysis (and potential biases in the data and/or tools) to the Notebook #6 )
• Conclusion section needed ( Add conclusion to Notebook #5 )
• The benefit of notebooks over papers is that they allow for more interactive plotting so that data can be explored more thoroughly. If time permits, it would be great to add interactivity to the plots.

[acocac]

The notebook is good to go -- the reviewed version is available in the Notebook-Final branch!