test: add some missing unit tests for 'convertObject'

[SEWeiTung]

According to AI's suggestions at #5302, it seems there're some missing unit tests and here's the fix for it.

• npm test passes
• tests and/or benchmarks are included
• documentation is changed or added
• commit message follows commit guidelines

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update enhances the convertValue function in utils.js for increased efficiency by exiting early when a match is found for ignore keys. It also introduces the ability to convert objects with specific properties into predefined strings, and extends support to handle regular expressions and anonymous classes. This is complemented by corresponding test enhancements in utils.test.js to verify these new capabilities and improvements.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
lib/core/utils.js test/lib/core/utils.test.js	Updated convertValue for efficiency and added handling for specific object properties, regular expressions, and anonymous classes.

🐇✨
A hop, a skip, in the code we dive,
Tweaks and turns, making efficiency thrive.
Objects and strings, in harmony they sing,
With regex and classes, our changes take wing.
Here's to the code, ever so spry,
Under the moonlit, starry sky.
🌟🌙

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between abd1490 and 8f88e67.

Files selected for processing (2)

• lib/core/utils.js (1 hunks)
• test/lib/core/utils.test.js (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

Additional comments not posted (4)

lib/core/utils.js (1)

23-30: The optimization to break out of the loop early upon finding a match in the ignore list is a good improvement for efficiency. Consider adding a brief comment above the loop to explain its purpose and the reason for early termination, enhancing code readability.

test/lib/core/utils.test.js (3)

128-129: The addition of a test case for converting regular expressions is a valuable enhancement to ensure this functionality is correctly handled. Good job on covering this scenario.

---

131-147: Adding a test for the conversion of a plain recursive object, especially with ignored values, is an excellent way to ensure the robustness of this functionality. The test is well-designed and covers an important scenario.

---

149-156: The inclusion of a test case for converting anonymous classes enhances the test suite by covering a less common but important scenario. This is a thoughtful addition.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.86%. Comparing base (794d7f3) to head (685b91e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5303   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.86%   99.86%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        3620     3620           
  Branches      519      519           
=======================================
  Hits         3615     3615           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.