Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump arrayvec from 0.5.2 to 0.7.2 #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 25, 2021

Bumps arrayvec from 0.5.2 to 0.7.2.

Changelog

Sourced from arrayvec's changelog.

0.7.2

0.7.1

  • Add new ArrayVec methods .take() and .into_inner_unchecked() by @​conradludgate
  • clone_from now uses truncate when needed by @​a1phyr

0.7.0

  • fn new_const is now the way to const-construct arrayvec and arraystring, and fn new has been reverted to a regular "non-const" function. This works around performance issue #182, where the const fn version did not optimize well. Change by @​bluss with thanks to @​rodrimati1992 and @​niklasf for analyzing the problem.

  • The deprecated feature flag unstable-const-fn was removed, since it's not needed

  • Optimize .retain() by using the same algorithm as in std, change by @​niklasf, issue #174. Original optimization in Rust std by @​oxalica in Optimize Vec::retain rust-lang/rust#81126

0.6.1

  • The ArrayVec::new and ArrayString::new constructors are properly const fns on stable and the feature flag unstable-const-fn is now deprecated. by @​rodrimati1992

  • Small fix to the capacity check macro by @​Xaeroxe

  • Typo fix in documentation by @​cuviper

  • Small code cleanup by @​bluss

0.6.0

  • The const generics release 🎉. Arrayvec finally implements what it wanted to implement, since its first version: a vector backed by an array, with generic parameters for the arbitrary element type and backing array capacity.

    The New type syntax is ArrayVec<T, CAP> where CAP is the arrayvec capacity.

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [arrayvec](https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec) from 0.5.2 to 0.7.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/bluss/arrayvec/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](bluss/arrayvec@0.5.2...0.7.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: arrayvec
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 25, 2021

The following labels could not be found: A2-insubstantial, B0-silent, C1-low 📌.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants