fix package.json license #310
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yeah this is mainly client/server but it is on my todo list to check the licenses App Store compatibility |
|
I know that there has been some issues in the past with GPL licenses |
frankiebee
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the package.json was inconsistent with the LICENSE.md
There is another conversation here which is "what is Entropy's approach to licensing?". This is a copyleft license which will immediately raise flags for some organizations. This particular license is also of questionable relevance in p2p contexts (but I think that's fine because this SDK is more client/server right?)