proto: Adds slow start config to wrr proto message

[anuragagarwal561994]

Commit Message: Adds support for slow_start config to client side wrr lb policy
Additional Description: Adds support in proto for slow start config for support in client side wrr for GRPC
Risk Level: Low
Testing: N/A
Docs Changes: N/A
Release Notes: N/A
Platform Specific Features: N/A

[repokitteh-read-only]

Hi @anuragagarwal561994, welcome and thank you for your contribution.

We will try to review your Pull Request as quickly as possible.

In the meantime, please take a look at the contribution guidelines if you have not done so already.

🐱

Caused by: #40090 was opened by anuragagarwal561994.

see: more, trace.

[repokitteh-read-only]

CC @envoyproxy/api-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to (api/envoy/|docs/root/api-docs/).
envoyproxy/api-shepherds assignee is @wbpcode
CC @envoyproxy/api-watchers: FYI only for changes made to (api/envoy/|docs/root/api-docs/).

🐱

Caused by: #40090 was opened by anuragagarwal561994.

see: more, trace.

[anuragagarwal561994]

Related Proposal for GRPC Implementation: grpc/proposal#498

[wbpcode]

I am OK to the API. But if we have no implementation for this, we may should mark it as unimplemented?

/wait

[anuragagarwal561994]

@wbpcode sure how do I mark it unimplemented, this is my first contribution here so need some help.

I am also willing to add another MR for the same with the implementation of slow start config to client WRR, if possible please help me with how can I do the same.

[wbpcode]

You could add [#not-implemented-hide:] tag to mark it as unimplemented. You could find lots of examples about this tags in the /api.

But will prefer to wait the grpc/proposal#498 to be merged first. :)

[anuragagarwal561994]

@wbpcode I have made the respective changes to indicate this as unimplemented

[wbpcode]

@wbpcode I have made the respective changes to indicate this as unimplemented

ping me at slack or github once the grpc approved your proposal. :)

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Please feel free to give a status update now, ping for review, or re-open when it's ready. Thank you for your contributions!

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. Please feel free to give a status update now, ping for review, or re-open when it's ready. Thank you for your contributions!

[anuragagarwal561994]

@wbpcode can we re-open this MR, the proposal is ready and will be merged soon

[paul-r-gall]

Instead of just slow_start_config, why don't we add the entire Round robin proto in here? that way you can pass the whole round robin proto to the underlying Round Robin LB that backs ClientSideWeightedRR.

[anuragagarwal561994]

I think this can be done, if it will be easier to implement it in envoy what do you think @wbpcode

[nezdolik]

friendly ping @wbpcode

[wbpcode]

LGTM. Thanks.