Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: relaxing case restriction for redundancy Type. #863

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

kpdhulipala
Copy link
Contributor

feat: relaxing case restriction for redundancy Type.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 32.63%. Comparing base (4b61c51) to head (3b3dfde).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
equinix/resource_network_device_link.go 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #863      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.70%   32.63%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       26636    26608      -28     
==========================================
- Hits         8711     8683      -28     
  Misses      17778    17778              
  Partials      147      147              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

schadalawada
schadalawada previously approved these changes Feb 19, 2025
@kpdhulipala kpdhulipala marked this pull request as draft February 20, 2025 00:15
@kpdhulipala kpdhulipala force-pushed the redundancyType branch 4 times, most recently from c270e01 to 25bf227 Compare February 24, 2025 22:36
@kpdhulipala kpdhulipala marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 22:40
@kpdhulipala kpdhulipala merged commit 8f9e7df into equinix:main Feb 26, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Copy link

This PR is included in version 3.3.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants