-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Oss 7 copy return for return by ref methods #310
Closed
FranckRJ
wants to merge
11
commits into
eranpeer:dev
from
iress:OSS-7-copy-return-for-return-by-ref-methods
+138
−9
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4deaddc
Take copy or return value if explicit by value used, when mocking ret…
malcolmdavey f400443
fix typos
malcolmdavey 6820aeb
Handle automatically for temporaries
malcolmdavey fce1dd8
Remove optional move (which was just an optimisation), so we can supp…
malcolmdavey 4e91eef
Add ReturnCopy
malcolmdavey e856bee
Always Return Copy
malcolmdavey 22cbe76
Merge branch 'dev-2.3.1' into OSS-7-copy-return-for-return-by-ref-met…
malcolmdavey deb9714
All RRef for AlwaysReturn for Ref args
malcolmdavey 4400bdd
Merge branch 'OSS-7-copy-return-for-return-by-ref-methods' of github.…
malcolmdavey a3b6b2d
Fix up to work with newer move only return tests.
malcolmdavey 36ad3e6
Fix mistake in new AlwaysReturn
malcolmdavey File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently I'm getting failures for this line/test: cannot convert argument 1 from 'int' to 'int &'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By "currently" you mean the code in the PR (so, without the changes in your message) or the code once you apply the changes in your message?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, if I try this "suggested change" to the PR, then it fails for basic integer values (maybe because of other overloads)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using this
I get this error message:
Not saying there isn't a way to fix it but just haven't found it yet.
Also thinking the existing overload just shouldn't support R value refs at all, so should be specific to lvalue refs, in stead of all refs, as it will always be a dangling pointer, and hence always undefined behaviour.