Exposed args to ErgoExo, provided _mflow_func abstraction #93
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This abstraction could work for value_and_grad if we break backwards compatibility by changing return type slightly, happy to discuss.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ErgoExo now takes
argsas an additional argument to__call__andvalue_and_grad, enabling another way to "train" opposed tomodules.Abstracted
__call__by adding_mlflow_funcabstraction which could work for value_and_grad if we break backwards compatibility by changing return type slightly (e.g. packaging grad, val in a tuple), happy to discuss.