Improve documentation of the binary
module
#7585
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
same-function-with-different-arity(..., Default)
", which can be grouped together into a single paragraph which mentions the defaults.decode_hex
,decode_unsigned
,encode_hex
andencode_unsigned
was mingled, ie not in the usual alphabetical order; it might be debatable whether or not opposing functions should be ordered such that they are grouped together (decode_hex
,encode_hex
,decode_unsigned
,encode_unsigned
vsdecode_hex
,decode_unsigned
,encode_hex
,encode_unsigned
), but the current order was off in any case.copy
explicitly stated that abadarg
exception will be raised ifN < 0
. As the specs already state thatN = integer() >= 0
, this sentence is IMO redundant.