[Snyk] Security upgrade django from 3.2.14 to 3.2.21 #58
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-2968205 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3039675 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3266406 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3319450 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5496950 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5750790 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5880505
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `pip` dependencies of this project.
Changes included in this PR
Vulnerabilities that will be fixed
By pinning:
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-2968205
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3039675
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3266406
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-3319450
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5496950
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5750790
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-5880505
django:3.2.14 -> 3.2.21(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.
Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)
🦉 Arbitrary File Upload