Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

C3 rev correction #136

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

C3 rev correction #136

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

lure23
Copy link
Contributor

@lure23 lure23 commented Jan 7, 2024

This is the only place in the awesome book that had me doubting.. Perhaps what is written as "revision 3" should be "revision 0.3"?

In the book itself, this line lists a C3 revision as "0.3".

I have a 0.4:

$ cargo espflash board-info
[2024-01-07T21:06:35Z INFO ] Serial port: '/dev/ttyUSB0'
[2024-01-07T21:06:35Z INFO ] Connecting...
[2024-01-07T21:06:35Z INFO ] Using flash stub
Chip type:         esp32c3 (revision v0.4)       <<-----
Crystal frequency: 40MHz
[...]

Please verify. I am not in the position to know, where the JTAG became built-in, but I do hope my 0.4 board has it.

@lure23
Copy link
Contributor Author

lure23 commented Jan 7, 2024

Found a source to back up my gut feel:

Debugging through the USB interface implemented in ESP32-C3 requires to have a chip with revision 0.3 or newer.

Copy link
Member

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm! Thanks for the clarification. You are completely right, 0.3 is the correct way to name the version.

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez merged commit daddbfb into esp-rs:main Jan 8, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants