feat(app_update): esp_ota_mark_app_invalid_rollback() without reboot (IDFGH-14234)

[nebkat]

Description

In our application we perform Bluetooth OTAs through a mobile app, reconnecting after the initial OTA to confirm the update as valid or rollback if other issues were encountered.

Currently the only API available to mark the app as invalid is esp_ota_mark_app_invalid_rollback_and_reboot(), which immediately calls esp_restart() on success. This results in the Bluetooth connection being cut short and prevents other app cleanup from happening that we would otherwise do during a cooperative reboot request.

This PR simply extracts the call to esp_restart() to esp_ota_mark_app_invalid_rollback_and_reboot() itself, and provides an esp_ota_mark_app_invalid_rollback() function that does not restart.

Checklist

Before submitting a Pull Request, please ensure the following:

• 🚨 This PR does not introduce breaking changes.
• All CI checks (GH Actions) pass.
• Documentation is updated as needed.
• Tests are updated or added as necessary.
• Code is well-commented, especially in complex areas.
• Git history is clean — commits are squashed to the minimum necessary.

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	🎉 Good Job! All checks are passing!

👋 Hello nebkat, we appreciate your contribution to this project!

---

📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

---

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

---

Click to see more instructions ...

This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...

We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests via this public GitHub repository.

This GitHub project is public mirror of our internal git repository

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved, we synchronize it into our internal git repository.
4. In the internal git repository we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
5. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.
5. On next sync from the internal git repository merged change will appear in this public GitHub repository.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 6ec276b

[KonstantinKondrashov]

LGTM!

[nileshkale123]

sha=6ec276b3e8bbb6667218a35b95ecf756371f1076