Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump play-json-jsoniter to 1.1.1 #639

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

odbc
Copy link

@odbc odbc commented Jul 9, 2024

Play-json-jsoniter diff

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 10, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9873751455

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 81.066%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9804463972: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3284
Relevant Lines: 4051

💛 - Coveralls

@@ -1 +1 @@
ThisBuild / version := "3.4.1-SNAPSHOT"
ThisBuild / version := "4.0.0"
Copy link
Contributor

@mr-git mr-git Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dfakhritdinov, I suppose we are not ready for this, yet :)

@odbc, we have a lot more of cleanup and changes planned for 4.0.0 and we'd like to postpone release of 4.0.0 for a while.
How play-json-jsoniter 1.1.1 differs from 0.10.2 besides package and version? is it otherwise binary compatible?

Copy link

@plokhotnyuk plokhotnyuk Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@odbc @mr-git @dfakhritdinov What do you think about contribution of play-json-jsoniter to jsoniter-scala repo?

It can fix publishing to the Maven Central and missing artifacts for Scala 3 and Scala Native.

Also, per commit MiMa checks will guarantee backward binary compatibility for minor versions and both directions (backward and forward binary compatibility) for patch versions.

/cc @t3hnar

Copy link
Author

@odbc odbc Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How play-json-jsoniter 1.1.1 differs from 0.10.2 besides package and version? is it otherwise binary compatible?

Yes, it should be actually compatible. Looking at diff I noticed only some changes in signatures of internal API (JsonValueCodecJsValue.apply)

But the versions compatibility checker considers play-json-jsoniter versions binary incompatible and makes the PR red

Copy link
Contributor

@dfakhritdinov dfakhritdinov Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Its not only about making the PR green 😞

Almost all Evolution libs/apps are using semver thus the bump of play-json-jsoniter version will end-up with bumping it everywhere where its present (transitively). I agree with @mr-git and prefer to combine major version bump with some other planned maintenance.

@odbc, how urgent is the PR?

Copy link
Author

@odbc odbc Jul 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@odbc, how urgent is the PR?

It can wait until your major update

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi there!

@plokhotnyuk
I can try to help with play-json-jsoniter -> jsoniter-scala contribution if nobody minds

cc: @dfakhritdinov

@mr-git mr-git added this to the 4.0.0 milestone Aug 19, 2024
@dfakhritdinov
Copy link
Contributor

closed in favor of #664

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants