-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
run-length-encoding-exercise: added new exercise. #115
run-length-encoding-exercise: added new exercise. #115
Conversation
Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂 We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch. If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post. Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
It would be excellent if we had a If I understand correctly, your example solution uses some memory near address 0 and some memory near address 320, in addition to the memory for the input string. Should we perhaps be passing in a destination address? |
In |
My solutions on other low-level tracks would write the digits to the output in reverse order, and then reverse in place. |
I also do it in |
|
Cool! Thank you. I'll try to reimplement this part of my solution. |
@keiravillekode Done. I changed the number consuming in decode function. Anything else? |
@ErikSchierboom - we can't see the updates until the PR is reopened. I think we can merge this and we might want to refine or expand In a month or two, we can decide on sample solutions for Dig Deeper. Here are my two suggestions: One solution for this exercise would overwrite the input with the output. For the Another solution would write the output immediately after the input in memory - assuming |
This Now has a merge conflict |
I'll resolve it. |
@ErikSchierboom Done |
Added new exercise for #48in24.