feat: add json string validation action #957
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hendrikheil
force-pushed
the
feat/json-string-validation
branch
from
850c22f to
e0abe52
Compare
|
Thank you Hendrik! I will review this PR after our v1 RC or stable v1 is out. |
fabian-hiller
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f41426c to
d713dfe
Compare
hendrikheil
force-pushed
the
feat/json-string-validation
branch
from
e0abe52 to
051ab71
Compare
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
commit: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR defines a JSON action to validate strings to be valid json strings (not objects).
Recently an Issue was created to document a valibot schema to validate objects to be json compliant. In that PR @fabian-hiller mentioned a validation action to ensure strings are valid JSON. This PR aims to add that action to valibot.
I'm a bit torn if this action should be called
jsonorjsonString. I lean towards just calling itjson, which is why I went with that.Relevant comment: #933 (comment)
There is another open PR that adds documentation for the valibot schema to validate objects for json compliance here: #936